Under Basel III, the minimum 澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果体彩网:capital adequacy ratio that banks must maintain is 8%. The capital adequacy ratio measures a bank's capital in relation to its risk-weighted assets.
The capital-to-risk-weighted-assets ratio promotes strong capitalization and better financial resilience of banks throughout the world to resist economic and financial shocks and crises, such as the global receꦑssion that hit in 2008. With higher capitalization, banks can better withstand episodes of financial stress in the economy.
Key Takeaways
- Basel III is an international regulatory accord that set out reforms meant to improve the regulation, supervision, and risk management in the banking sector.
- Because of the impact of the 2008 credit crisis, banks must maintain minimum capital requirements and leverage ratios.
- Under Basel III, Common Equity Tier 1 must be at least 4.5% of risk-weighted assets (RWA) while Tier 1 capital must be at least 6%, and total capital must be at least 8.0%.
- The total minimum capital adequacy ratio of both tiers, also including the capital conservation buffer, is 10.5%.
Basel III Capital Adequacy Ratio Minim♊um Requirement
The capital adequacy ratio is calculated by adding tier 1 capital to tier 2 capital and dividing by risk-weighted assets. 澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果体彩网:Tier 1 capital is the core capital of a bank, which includes equity capital and disclosed reserves. This type of capital absorbs losses without requiring the bank to cease its operations; 澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果体彩网:tier 2 capital is used to absorb lo♐sses in the even꧋t of a liquidation.
Under Basel III, a bank's tier 1 and tier 2 minimum capital adequacy ratio (including the capital conservation buffer) must be at least 10.5% of its risk-weighted assets (RWA). That combines the total capital requirement of 8% with the 2.5% capital conservation buffer. The capital conservation buffer recommendation is designed to build up banks' capital, which they could use in periods of stress.
Fast Fact
The Basel III requirements were in response to the significant weakness in financial regulation that was revealed in the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis, with regulaꦇtors seeking to build up bank liquidity and limit lev🐼erage.
Example of Basel III Capital Adequacy Ratio
For example, assume Bank A has $5 million in tier 1 capital and $3 million in tier 2 cap꧑ital. Bank A loaned $5 million to ABC Corporation, which has 25% riskiness, and $50 million to XYZ Corporation, which has 55% riskiness.
Bank A has risk-weighted assets of $28.75 million ($5 million * 0.25 + $50 million * 0.55). It also has capital of $8 million, ($5 million + $3 million). Its resulting total capital adequacy ratio is 27.83% ($8 million/$28.75 million * 100), and its♎ Tier 1 ratio is 17.39% ($5 ✨million/$28.75 million * 100). Therefore, Bank A attains the minimum capital adequacy ratios under Basel III.
Basel III Minimum Leverage Ratio
Another of the major capital standards changes of the Basel III Accord was a reduction in excess leverage from the banking sector. For these purposes, banking leverage means the proportion of a bank's capital measure and its exposure measure.
The Basel Committee decided on new leverage measurements and requirements because it was "of the view that a simple leverage ratio framework is critical and complementary to the risk-based capital framework and that the leverage should adequately capture both the on- and off-balance sheet sources of banks’ leverage."
Important
Basel III builds on the structure of Basel II but brings in higher standards for capital and liquidity, therefore increasing the overseeing and ri♚sk management of the financial industry.
The Basel Committee introduced new legislation to target and limit the operations of the so-called global systemically important banks (G-SIBs), also known as systemically important financial institutions (SIFIs).
These are the classic too-big-to-fail banks, only on a global scale. In the United States, such banks are subject to intensive stress testing and excess regulations. The Fed issued supplementary leverage ratio minimums of 3% for banks with over $250 billion in consolidated total assets and 5% for banks with over $700 billion, including SIFIs such as JP Morgan Chase, Citigroup, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, and Bank of New York Mellon.
The Basel III leverage requirements were set out in several phases that began in 2013. The second phase, 澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果体彩网:public disclosure of leverage ratios, was originally set for voluntary implementation in Jan. 2015, but was ultimately delayed. Subsequent adjustment phases determined any calibrations or exceptions that were necessary and implementation was set for Jan. 1, 2022.
What Is the Main Purpose of Basel III?
The main purpose of Basel III is to implement measures in order to increase the regulation and monitoring of banks with the goal of improving their risk management in order to reduce their risk♏s. Basel III was a response to the financial crisis in 2007-🐲2008.
What Are the 3 Pillars of Basel III?
The three pillars of Basel III are: minimum capital requirements, supervisory review, and market discipline.
What Is the Capital Adequacy Ratio in Basel III?
The capital adequacy ratio in Basel III is 8%. The tier 1 and tier 2 capital adequacy ratio must be 10.5%, which is a combination of the total capital requirement of 8% and the 2.5% capital conservation buffer.
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc()/What-minimum-capital-Adequacy-ratio-must-be-attained-under-basel-iii_final_rev_-1ba1b2672e0a4a8284d94a9d2b7b52fa.png)
Investopedia / Michela Buttignol
The Bottom Line
After the financial crisis in 2008, 澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果体彩网:reg🦋ulators sought to strengthen liquid🦂ity and reduce the risks in the banking sector. Implementing capital adequacy ratios ensures that banks have a proportionate am꧋ount of capital on hand﷽ in relation to their risk-weighted assets, reducing risk.