Investopedia’s list of the best online brokerage platforms is based🌄 on in-depth research and robust data across 26 companies that offer trading and investing services. We reviewed each broker’s research amenities, trading technology, range of offerings, and much more. This guide explains t🥂he categories and criteria we used to evaluate each company’s offerings and our scoring process for determining the best online trading and investing platforms.
Our editors and researchers independently evaluate all recommended products and services to help our readers understand which companies are best suited for their goals and experiences, whether they are long-term investors or active traders. If you click on the links we provide, we may receive comp🐭ensation. Our advertising partnerships are not a factor in how we evalཧuate products, though they may affect the order of products you see listed in our articles.
How We Research Online Brokerages
To provide the best information to consumers looking for an online broker that best fits their needs, we 🌠developed a comprehensive ranking methodology based on a variety of factors that are cruc🐲ial in evaluating the offerings and usability of these platforms.
By combining industry research, subject matter expertise, and investor survey data, we developed a proprietary ꦺscoring methodology that allowed us to grade these often complex platforms based on 11 major categories and 89 criteria. You can trust that Investopedia is providing you with an 𝓡unbiased and comprehensive review of the top online brokers because of this all-encompassing methodology.
To collect the data, we asked the 26 companies to complete a d♉igital survey consisting of 110 questions. The responses to 89 of these questions were weighted as part of our scoring model, while the 21 remaining responses were used for editorial purposes. In addition, we had our team of researchers and editors verify the survey responses and collect any missing data points by conducting online research and contacting each company directly.
Many of the brokers we reviewed also performed live demonstrations of their platforms and services for us via video🐈 conferencing methods. We also obtained live brokerage accounts for most of the platforms we reviewed, which our team of expert writer🐬s and editors used to perform hands-on testing.
Online Broker Evaluation Categories
Based on a combination of investor survey data and subject matter expꦏertise, we developed the following category weights:
Online Broker Evaluation Criteria
These categories were then broken down into 89 weighted criteria, resulting in 2,314 data points that comprise our scoring rubri😼c.
Through this all-encompassing data collection and review process, Investopedia has provided you with an unbiased and thorough review of the to𒆙p r🧸obo-advisors.
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc()/Screenshot-edit1-109c72b6648b409f932c343431cad592.jpg)
From Public's online demonstration with Investopedia
Data Scoring
- Data points are scored on a 0.00 - 1.00 scale
- Binary criteria = [0,1]
- Scaled criteria (e.g., 5-point) = [0.00, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1.00]
- Continuous criteria, minimum value in the database was re-scaled to 0.00 and maximum value was re-scaled to 1.00
Research Amenities
For traders and investors who are active in managing their finances🐻, conducting research is a critical step in making buying and selling decisions. By studying and evaluating key elements such as price action and industry fundamentals, individual investors can make more informed investment choices.
The best online brokers provide both proprietary and thi🐟rd-party research, making it easy for investors to screen for𝕴 key technical and fundamental criteria while helping them research the growth prospects of a wide range of companies and industries.
This entire s💃ection accounts for 13.00% of the total weighted sc✤ore in our evaluation.
Screeners Offered
We scored this item on a continuous scale of 0.00 to 1.00. Companies with the largest selection of screeners (ESG/SRI, stocks, ETFs, options, mutual funds, fixed income, crypto) received a𓃲 high score and companies with the smallest selection received a low score.
Ability to Build Custom Screens
We used a binary scale for this and gave brokers that📖 allow users to build custom screens a score of 1, while brokers lacking this feature received a score of 0.
Abilit⛦y to Screen Based on Technical Indicators
Brokers that give u🌟sers the ability t♈o screen based on technical indicators were given a score of 1, while brokers without this feature received a score of 0 (binary scale).
Ability to Screen Based on Fundamentಌal ꦗIndicators
We used a binary scale and brokers that give users the ෴abiliꦺty to screen based on fundamental indicators were given a score of 1, while brokers without this feature received a score of 0.
Ability to Save Custom Screens
Via a binary scale, we gave brokers that allow ꧂users to save cu🍸stom screens a score of 1, while brokers lacking this capability received a score of 0.
Ability to ♐Turn Screen Results Into a Watchlist
Brokers that offer users the ability to turn screen results into a watchlist were given a score of 1, while brokers without this ability receive𝓡d a score of 0 (binary scale).
Trade Idea Generator Offered
Brokers that provide trade idea generators were given a score of 1, while brokers without this feature received a score of 0 (bin𝐆ary scale).
Daily Market Research Reports Offered
Brokers that provide users with daily market research reports were given a score of 1, while br💃okers without this item recꦜeived a score of 0 (binary scale).
Available Chart Types
We scored this item on a continuous scaleꦬ of 0.00 to 1.00. Companies with the largest selection of chart types (line, bar, candle, vertex line, etc.) received a high score and companies with the smallest selection received a low score♛.
Access to Proprietary Research
We scored this item on a binary scale of 0 or 1. Companies that provide proprietary, in-house research received a 1, and 🌃companies without this feature received a 0.
Level of Access to Third Party Research
For this criteria, we scaled the responses (0.00, 0.50, 1.00) and awarded companies with free access to third party providers the highest score of 1, while companies that ch𒉰arge extra for this research were given a score of 0.50, and companies offering no third-party research at all were given the lowest possible score of 0.
Trading Technology
Having the right trading technology in place helps investors identify actionable market inefficiencies and high-probability trade ideas, all while bei🦄ng able to execute these trades in a manner that is efficient and fair.
T▨his entire section accounts for 11.00% of the total weighted score in our evalu▨ation.
Ability to Backtest Trading Strategies
Brokers that offerꦡ the ability to backtest trading strategies were given a score of 1, while brokers without this feꦅature received a score of 0 (binary scale).
Ability to Route Orders
Brokers that offer 🎶the ability to route orders were given a score of 1, while brokers without this feature received a score of 0 (binary scale).
Available Platforms
For thisꦦ criteria, we scaled the responses (0.00, 0.50, 1.00) and awarded companies with the widest selection of trading platforms (website portal, desktop, mobile app) the highest scores. Conversely, companies with the fewest platforms received the lowest scores.
Algorithmic Trading Availability
We scored this on a binary scale, giving brokers that provide algorithm🌳ic trading capabilities a score of♛ 1 and companies that lack this feature a score of 0.
Algorithmic Trading Demo Account Availability
♑ We scored this on a binary scale, giving brokers that provide an🔴 algorithmic trading demo account a score of 1, while companies that lack this feature received a score of 0.
Algorithmic Trading Order Types
We scored thi𒉰s item on a continuous scale of 0.00 to 1.00. Companies with the largest selection of algorithmic trading order types (market, limit, stop limit, OCO, GTC, GTD, day, etc.) received a high score and companies with the smallest selection received a low score.
Backtest Data
We scored this on a binary scale, giving brokers that provide hist♔orical backtest data a score of 1, while compa✱nies that lack this information received a score of 0.
Ability to Automate Trading Strategies
Brokers that provide users a way to automate trading strategies were given a score of 1❀, while brokers lacking this item received a score of 0 (binary scale).
Average Payment for Order Flow (PFOF) per Share
We scored this item on a continuous scale of 0.00 to 1.00. Companies with the lowest PFOF per share ($0) received a high score and companies with the highest PFOF ($0.755) received a low score.&n🦄bsp;
Average Payment for𝔍 Order Flow (PFOF) per Option Contract
We scored this item on a continuous scale of 0.00 to🔯 1.00. Companies with the lowest PFOF per option contract ($0) received a high score and companies with the highest PFOF ($0.60) received a low score.
Net Price Improvement per Share
We scored this item on a continuous scale of 0.ꦛ00 to 1.00. Companies with the best net price improvement per share received a high ꦆscore and companies with the worst net price improvement per share received a low score.
Net Price Improvement per Options Contract
We scored this item on a continuous scale of 0.00 to 1.00. Companies with the best net price improvement per options contract received a high score and companies with🦩 the worst net price improvement per options contract received a low score.
Range of Offerings
All of the brokers we reviewed offer customers a platform on which to trade stocks and ETFs, but that’s where most of the similarities end. In addition to these two popular asset classes, the best brokers also allow investors to place orders in mutual funds, fixed income, certifi🦹cates of deposit (CDs), options, futures, currencies🔜, and cryptocurrencies.
In addition, investors have the potential to invest with a global reach. However, you’ll find that these companies vary greatly in the global markets they allow you to access, as well as the countries in which they offer support. There’s also the question of whether a company allows you to make fractional share trades and fractional dividend reinvestments, and what types of accounts you’ll be permitted to open, such as individual brokerage accounts, individua🍌l retirement accounts (IRAs) Roth IRAs, 401(k)s, or something else.
This entire secღtion accounts for 11.00% of the total weighted score in our evaluation.
Asset Classes Off✃ered Across Website, Desktop Software, and Mobile Tr𓂃ading Platforms
We scored these items on a cont🎶inuous scale of 0.00 to 1.00. Companies with larger selections of tradable and investable asset c🎶lasses (stocks, mutual funds, ETFs, bonds, CDs, options, alternative investments) received a higher score and companies with smaller selections (stocks, ETFs, bonds, options) received lower scores.
Stocks on the ‘Easy to Borrow’ List
We scored this item on a continuous scale of 0.00 to 1.00. Companies with larger numbers of stocks on the 澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果体彩网:"easy to borrow" list (21,332) received higher scores and companies with smaller or the smallest number (0) rece😼ived l๊ower scores.
Number of Legs 💟⛦Possible in an Equity Options Strategy
We scored this item on a continuous scale of 0.00 to 1.00. Compani꧒es with the greatest number of option legs (6) received a high score and companies with the smallest number (1) received the lowest score.
International Exchanges Offered Across Websi൲te, Desktop Software, and Mobile Trading Platforms
We scored these items on a continuous scale of 0.00 to 1.00. Companies with the most international exchanges (93) received the hig🌠hest score and companies with the fewest exchanges (0) received the lowest score.
Countries Available to Trade In
We scored this item on a continuous scale of 0.00 to 1.ℱ00. Companies with the greatest access to international support (200 countries) received the highest score and companies with the fewest supported countries (1) received the lowest score.
Asset Classes Offered for Algorithmic Trading
We scored this item on a continuous scale of 0.00 to 1.00. Companies with the largest selection of asset classes available for 澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果体彩网:algorithmic trading (stocks, ETFs, options, futures, futures options, and Treasury products) received the highesꦺt score. Conversely, companies without this feature received a score of 0.
Number of Stocks Available for Alg𒅌orithmic Trading
𝓡 For this criteria, we scaled the responses (0.00, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1.00) and awarded companies with the largest selection of stocks (no limitations) the highest scores. Companies without this feature received a score of 0.
Ability to 🔥Trade Fractional Shares of Stock and E🏅TFs
For this criteria, we scaled the responses (0.00, 0.50, 1.00) and awarded companies that allow customers to buy and sell fractional shares of both stocks and ETFs the highest♐ score of 1.00. Companies that allow fractional trading in just one of these two assets were given a score of 0.50, as were companies that only offer the ability to liquidate fractional shares. Finally, companies lacking fractional share trading in stocks or ETFs were given a 0.00.
Access to a Variety of Account Types
We sco♓red this item on a continuous scale of 0.00 to 1.00. Companies with access to the largest variety of account types (individual brokerage account, IRA, Roth IRA, UTGMA, and more) received a high score and companies with the smallest selection (just individual brokerage accounts) received ♔a low score.
A🧜bility to Make Fracti♍onal Dividend Reinvestments
We scored this item on a binary scale. Brokers that provide users with the ability to make fractional dividend reinvestments were given a score o𝕴f 1, while brokers without this item received a score of 0.
Platform Experience
Whether you're a passive investor with a fairly hands-off approach to your investing or a more active trader who is constantly looking to speculate in daily market swings, there's a broker that fits your needs. This section covers the critical features that will help make for the best experience when you are ready to place an order and set risk parameters around it.
This entire section accounts for 10.00% of the total weight𓆏ed score in our evaluation.
Real-Time Stock Streaming on Trading Platform
We scored this item on a binary scale. Brokers that offer real-time stock streaming on each available trading platform were given a score of 1, while broke꧙rs without this capability received a score of 0.
Sim♕u✃ltaneous Real-Time Stock Streaming on Multiple Platforms
We scored this item on a binary scale. Brokers that provide users with simultaneous real-time stock streaming on multiple platforms (desktop software, website portal, mobile app) were given a score of 1, while brokers without this functionaliꦜty received a score 🤪of 0.
Ability to Select a Tax Lot Before Placing an🍒 Order Online
We scored tﷺhis item on a binary scale. We gave companies with the ability to select a tax lot before placing an order a score of 1, while companies without this capability received a low score of 0.
Order Types Offered Across Websi♛te, Desktop Software, and Mobile T🔜rading Platforms
W🍨e scored these items on a continuous scale of 0.00 to 1.00. Companies with the largest selection of order types offered (limit, mar♎ket, stop, stop limit, MOC, LOC, MOO, LOO, trailing stop, and more) received a higher score and companies with the smallest selection (market, limit, stop, stop limit) received a lower score.
Additional Features Offered Across Website, Desktop Software, and Mo𒆙bile Trading Platforms
We scored this item on a continuous scale of 0.00 to 1.00. Companies with the largest selection of additional features offered (ability to stage orders for later entry, trade direಌctly from the price chart, customize the platform, and customize the price chart) 𒉰received a higher score and companies with the smallest selection of features (ability to customize price chart) received a lower score.
No Serious Platform 🌸Outages in the Past Four Years✨
We scored this item on a binary scale. Brokers with no record of any serious platform outages in the last four years, which is generally considered to be the average length of a business cycle, were given aཧ score of 1. Conversely, brokers that have reported serious platform outages over this same period received a score of 0.
Costs
There are two different types of br🎶okerage firms: full-service and discount. The differences between the two and the fees they charge are significant. So how much does a broker cost? Our research takes into account costs and fees that are ty💫pical of both to properly compare these companies directly to one another.
This entire section accounts fo𒐪r 10.00% of the total weighted score in our evaluat🌳ion.
Inactivity Fees
We scored this item on a binary scale. Brokers that do not charge inactivity fees were given a score of 1, while br🎶okers that do charge these fees received a score of 0.
Base Commission for Stocks and ETFs
We✃ scored this item on a binary scale. Brokers that give users the option of having no base commissions on stocks and 🦹ETFs were given a score of 1, while brokers that lack this option received a score of 0.
Base Commission for Options
We scored this item on a binary scale. Brokಞers that don’t charge base commi🐟ssions on options were given a score of 1, while brokers that charge a base commission received a score of 0.
Account Closure Fees
We scored this item on a binary scale. Brokers with no account closure fees were given a score of 1, whilꦅe brokers with such fees received a score of 0.
Account Transfer Fees
We scored this item on a binary scale. Brokers with no tran💜sfer fees were given a score of 1, while brokers with these fees received a score of 0.
Wire Fees
We scored this item on a binary scale. Brokers that charge no wire fees were given a score of 🔴1, while brokers with wire fees received a score of 0.
Check Fees
We scored this item on a binary scale. Brokers that do not charge any fees for writing checks were given a sco🧸🌠re of 1, while brokers that do charge for this service received a score of 0.
Broker-Assisted Trade Fees
We scored this item on a 🅷continuous ꩵscale of 0.00 to 1.00. Companies with the lowest fees for placing broker-assisted trades ($0) received the highest score and companies with the highest fees ($45) received the lowest score.
Price per Futures Contract
Wꦛe scored this item on a conti🅺nuous scale of 0.00 to 1.00. Companies with the lowest prices per futures contract ($0.55) received a high score and companies with the highest prices ($2.25) received a low score.
Options Cost per Contract
We scored this item on a continuous scale of 0.00 to 1.00. Companies with the lowest costs per options contract ($0.00) received the highest score and companies with 🎉the highest costs ($1.25) received the lowest score.
Volume-Based Discounte▨d Fees for Options Trading
We scored this item on a binary scale. Brokers that offer discounted fees on optioꦿns trades upon meeting a certain thrಌeshold were given a score of 1, while brokers without this benefit received a score of 0.
Capped Fees for Options Trading
We scored this item on a binary scale. Brokers that capped fees on options trades upon meeting a certain threshold were given a score of 1,ꦬ while brokers without this benefit received a score of 0.
Base Commission for Penny Stocks
We scored this item on a binary scale. Brokers that offer the option of having no base commissions on 澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果体彩网:penny stocks were gꦉiven a score of 1, while brokers that lack this option received a score of 0.&n💧bsp;
Restrictions on Trading Penny Stocks
W𝐆e scored this🦂 item on a binary scale. Brokers that do not put volume or any other restrictions on penny stock trading were given a score of 1, while brokers that do impose restrictions received a score of 0.
Access to Penny Stock Trading
We scored this item on a binary scale. Brokers that do not restrict access to tradi🌳ng penny stocks on any platforms where other stocks can be traded were given a score of 1, while brokers that do restrict access on certain platforms received a sc🤪ore of 0.
No-Load Mutual Funds Offered
We scored this item on a binary scale. Brokers that offer no-load mutual funds were given a score of 1, w💯hile brokers without this product received a score of 0.
Recurring Investment Fees
We scored this item on a binary scale. Brokers with ꦜ♔no recurring investment fees were given a score of 1, while brokers that do charge such fees received a score of 0.
Educational Material
Markets a♌re complex, and trading and investing in them is no easy task. It’s essential to have an understanding of how markets work and how to use the countless tools and calculators available to grow your assets.
The best online brokers provide a wide range of educational material across several mediums, such as꧃ articles, videos, seminars, and webinars.
This entire section a🅰ccounts for 9.00% of the total weighted score in our evaluation.
Types of Educational Materials Offered
We scored this item on a continuous scale of 0.00 to 1.00. Companies with the largest selection of educational content (articles, videos, webinars, virtual learning environm♔ent, online topical events, live and on-demand webinars, in-platform education) received the highest score and companies with the smallest selection (just articles) received the lowest score.
Ability to Use Life Stage Planning Tools
We scored this item on a binary 🍸scale. Brokers that offer life stage𝓀 planning tools were given a score of 1, while brokers without this feature received a score of 0.
Portfolio Analysis and Reports
To be a successful investor, there is so much more to monitoring your account than simply checking your balance from time to time. For example, you shou༒ld have an understanding of whether you are over- 𝔉or under-exposed to certain sectors, or if there are any major tax implications with your investments.
The availability of expert assistance in these matters is a service that not all brokers offer. Not only will the best online brokers provide you with the proper tools and services to help keep your account on the right track, but they'll also allow you to sync your external accounts for a holistic view of your finances.
This entire section accounts for ✤9.00% of the total weighted score in our evaluation.
Real-Time Portfolio Reporting
We scored this item𒆙 on a binary scale. Brokers that offer portfolio reports in real-time were given a score of 1, while brokers without this feature received a score of 0.
Portfolio Tracking Features Offered
We scored this item on a continuous scale of 0.00 to 1.00. Companies offering the largest selection of portfolio tracking features (a sector allocation monitor, a sector allocation interpreter that alerts users to being under or over exposed to certain sectors, ability to sync a user's external accounts for consideration in his portfolio analysis) received a higher score and companies with the smallest selection (none) received a lower score.
Abili♏ty to Communicate With a Li𒁃ve, Licensed Broker
We scored this item on a binary scale. Brokers th๊at provide users with the ability to communicate with a live, licensed financial advisor were given a score of 1, while brokers without this feature received a score of 0.
Ability to Communicate Wit🌸h a Live, Licensed Financial Advis🐲or
We scored this item on a binary scale. Brokers that provide users with daily market resᩚᩚᩚᩚᩚᩚᩚᩚᩚ𒀱ᩚᩚᩚearch reports were given a score of 1, while brokers without this item received a score of 0.
Ability to Maintain Trading Journal
We scored this item on a binary scale. Brokers that provide users with the ability to maintain 🐟a trading journal were given a score of 1, while broke𝓰rs without this item received a score of 0.
Mobile App Usability
The conversations we had with many of the companies during our live demonstrations confirmed that interest in mobile trading continues to grow. Most brokers have robust desktop platforms, but mobile trading pla🔯tforms have become powerful tools that are loaded with features critical to investing and trading.
The best online brokers allow their mobile users to access the same tools and am𒈔enities available on their desktop apps and websites and at 𒁃similar speeds.
T🐻his entire section accounts for 9.00% of the total weighte𝓀d score in our evaluation.
Access to the Same Order Types as De🌳sktop or 🎐Web-Based Platforms
We scored this item on a binary scale. Brokers that provide users ꧒with access to the same order types on mobile as the desktop or web platform version were given a score of 1, while brokers without this func𝓀tionality received a score of 0.
Access to the Same Asset Classes as Desktop ♐or Web-Based Platforms
We scored this item on a binary scale. Brokers that offer access to the same asset classes on mobile as the desktop or web platform version were given a score of 1, while brokers without this ꧂feature received a score of 0.
Drawing Tools Available in the Charting Funct♑ionality
We scored this item ꦕon a b♔inary scale. Companies that provide users the ability to draw trend lines and other overlays on mobile app-based charts received a score of 1 while companies lacking this capability received a score of 0.
Customer Service
This category🎶 evaluates the services provided to customers when they need help with their account or trading experience. We scored this item on a c🎉ontinuous scale of 0.00 to 1.00. Companies with the largest selection of customer service options (email, live chat, in-person branch, phone, FAQs page, live broker) received a higher score and companies with the smallest selection received a lower score. This section accounts for 7.00% of the total weighted score in our evaluation.
Account Amenities
In this section, we look at the supplemental services that the brokerage offers other than ﷺstandard trading and investing features. Services like interest earned on uninvested cash and retirement tools are key components when it comes to making both tactical and long-term investment decisions.
This entire section accounts for 6.00% of the total weigh♛ted scor🌳e in our evaluation.
Portfolio Margin Available
We scored this item on a binary scale. Brokers that make portfolio margin available🌸 were given a score of 1, while brokers without this item received a 𝐆score of 0.
Abilܫity to Choose and Offer 🐻Shares Held Long to a Loan Program
We scored this item on a binary sca𒆙le. Companies offering users the ability to choose and offer shares held long to a loan program received a score of 1 while companies lacking this feature received a score of 0.
Interest Earned on Uninvested Cash
We scored this item oܫn a continuous scale of 0.00 to 1.00. Brokers that allow customers to earn the highest interest rate on uninvested cash (5.1%) were given the highest score, while brokers providing the lowest interest rate on cash balances (0%) received the lowesꦫt score.
Minimum Balance Required to Earn Interest 🐻on Uninvested Cash
We scored this item on a continuous scale of 0.00 to 1.00. Brokers that require the lowest account balance ($0) to earn inte💦rest on uninvested cash were given the highest score, while brokers requiring the highest balance ($100,000) recꦗeived the lowest score.
Uninveste꧋d Cash Automatically Swept Into a Money Market Fund 🍸
We scored this item on a binary scale. We gave brokers that offer users the option to automatically sweep uninvested cash into a money market fund 🐭a score of 1, while brokers without this item rec♏eived a score of 0.
Automatic Cash Sweep Frequency
For this criteria, we scaled the res🅷ponses (0.00, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1.00) and awarded companies with the most frequent sweep activity (daily) the highest scores. Conversely, companies with less frequent sweep activity received the lowest ꦗscores.
Deposit Requirement for Opening an IRA
We scored this item on 🔯a continuous scale of 0.00 to 1.00. Companies with the lowest requirement for opening an IRA ($0) received a higher score and companies with the highest requirement ($10,000) received a lower score.
Deposit Requirement for Opening a Roth IRA
We scored this item on a continuous scale of 0.00 to 1.00. Companies with the lowest requirement for opening a Roth IRA (🌊$0) received a higher score and companies with the highest requirement ($10,000) received a lower score.
Security
This category was evaluated based on the broker’s security features and the level of commitment the broker shows in keeping its clients’ sensitive information secure. While most of the brokers we reviewed offer biometric login procedures, that's where the similarities end.
This entire section accounts for 5.00% of the total weighted score in our🀅 evaluation.
Two-Factor Authentication Login
For this criteria, we scaled the responses (0.33, 0.67, 1.00) a🍨nd awarded companies offering two-factor authentication across the most platforms (website, desktop software, mobile app) the highest score o🌳f 1. Companies offering two-factor authentication across two platforms earned a score of 0.67. Companies providing this security measure on just one platform received a score of 0.33, while companies lacking this security measure on all platforms were given a score of 0.
Biometric Logins on Mobile App
We scored this item on a binary scale. Brokers that offer either fingerprint or face-scan-based biometric logins on the mobile𒆙 app were given a score of 1, while brokers without this feature received a score of 0.
No Data Breaches in the Past Four Years
We scored this item on a binary scale. Brokers that did not suffer any data breaches in the past four years, which is generally consid🍨ered to be the average length of a business cycle, were given a score of 1, while brokers that have experienced a serious data breach received a score of 0.
Articles That Use Our Methodology
⭕The investment industry is always evolving, w🐎ith new innovative trading tools and account amenities emerging. Online brokers and trading platforms are at the forefront of this dynamic landscape, which is why we’ve written extensively on the subject.
The research conducted and data collected to create 🔯this methodology have been used to compile the following list of reco▨mmendations:
- 澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果体彩网:Best Online Brokers
- 澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果体彩网:Best Options Trading Platforms
- 澳洲幸运5官方开奖❀结果体彩网:Best Brokers for I♔nternational Trading
- 澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果体彩网:Best Investment Apps
- 澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果体彩网:Best Day Trading Platforms
- 澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果体彩网:Best Roth IRA Accounts
- 澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果体彩网:Best Online Brokers for Beginners
- 澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果体彩网:Best Discount Brokers
- 澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果体彩网:Best IRA Accounts
- 澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果体彩网:Best Brokers for ETFs
- 澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果体彩网:Best Brokers for Penny Stocks
- 澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果体彩网:Best Brokers for Crypto Trading
All Investopedia articles that review the online brokerage companies that make up our list of the best, such as 澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果体彩网:Interactive Brokers and Fidelity, are based on the research, data, and grading process described in this methodology, along with subjective insights from our editors𝔍 and industry experts.
Meet the Research Team!
Amrut Deshmukh
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc()/Untitleddesign-a3442a70534c4ca2b00d47799d3683a9.png)
Sana Siddiqui
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc()/SanaSiddiqui-a49396d7798a4268a0286dcc6fa30b2f.jpg)
Michael Sacchitello
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc()/MichaelSacchitelloBio-6744f7bcfdbe4b1cb3027f0812327389.jpeg)