澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果体彩网

China Industry Group Reportedly Says Intel Has 'Constantly Harmed' National Security

Intel sign outside the company's headquarters in Santa Clara, California

David Paul Morris / Bloomberg via Getty Images

Key Takeaways

  • The Cybersecurity Association of China said Intel products pose a national security risk to that country, according to reports.
  • The Chinese agency called on the country's internet regulator to conduct a review of Intel products.
  • Last year, Chinese regulators banned the sale of Micron products to domestic operators.

Intel (INTC) shares fell Wednesday after a Chine🐼se industry group said the chips that Intel sells in China should be reviewed for national security risk🅷s. 

According to a report Wednesday from Reuters, the Cybersecurity Association of China (CSAC) said Intel has “constantly harmed” the country’s interests and security. The body, while not a government agency itself, called for a review of Intel products by the Cyberspace Administration of China (CAC), the country’s cyberspace and internet regulator, the news agency reported. 

"It is recommended that a network security review is initiated on the products Intel sells in China, so as to effectively safeguard China's national security and the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese consumers," CSAC said Wednesday, per Reuters.

Not First Action in China Against US Chip Maker

Intel didn't immediately respond to a request for comment by Investopedia.

There is some precedent for China taking action against American 澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果体彩网:semiconductor companies. In 2023, the CAC banned the sale of Micron Technology (MU) products to companies in China, citing a similar national security review.

Intel shares dropped about 4% early Wednesday, then recovered some ground to trade about 1% lower, at $22.42, by 1:15 p.m. ET. They have lost more than half their value year-to-date.

Do you have a news tip for Investopedia reporters? Please email us at
Article Sources
Investopedia requires writers to use primary sources to support their work. These include white papers, government data, original reporting, and interviews with industry experts. We also reference original research from other reputable publishers where appropriate. You can learn more about the standards we follow in producing accurate, unbiased content in our editorial policy.
  1. Reuters. “."

  2. Thomson Reuters Practical Law. " ."

  3. Micron Technology. “," Page 3.

Compare Accounts
The offers that appear in this table are from partnerships from which Investopedia receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where listings appear. Investopedia does not include all offers available in the marketplace.

Related Articles