澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果体彩网

With Nippon Deal Blocked, What's Next for US Steel?

Coal on barges on the Monongahela River near the United States Steel Corp. Clairton Coke Works facility in Clairton, Pennsylvania.

Justin Merriman / Bloomberg via Getty Images

Key Takeaways

  • President Joe Biden on Friday blocked the proposed $14 billion acquisition of U.S. Steel by Japan's Nippon Steel.
  • The companies in a joint statement vowed to "take all appropriate action to protect [their] legal rights."
  • Ohio-based Cleveland-Cliffs had previously offered to acquire U.S. Steel, a proposal that faced less opposition from both politicians and workers.

President Joe Biden on Friday blocked Japanese steel giant Nippon's $14 billion acquisition of U.S. Steel (X), throwing into qu🦩estion the prospects of the storied steelmak🌺er.

The U.S. Steel-Nippon deal faced headwinds from the jump. Politicians ♔on both sides of the aisle swift𝓰ly came out against the tie-up, alleging it would threaten national security and undermine U.S. trade protections. Some also expressed doubt that Nippon would protect American jobs, a concern shared by the United Steelworkers union, which also opposed the deal. 

The acquisition appeared all but doomed when the Committee on Foreign Investment in the Un🃏ited States (CꦍFIUS) late ♒last month failed to reach a consensus on the deal's security risks and punted the decision to Biden, who had repeatedly voiced his opposition. 

Can US Steel Challenge Biden's Decision?

One option for U.S. Steel in the wake of the White House's decision is to sue Nippon for failing to sway regulators. That's the path grocery chain Albertsons 澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果体彩网:chose last month after its $25 billion merger with rival Kroger was blocked ജin federal court. However, a joint statement from the companies suggested that🌺 was unlikely.

U.S. Steel and Nippon on Friday signaled they would continue to pursue the acquisition. "We continue to believe that a partnership between Nippon Steel and U.S. Steel is the best way to ensure that U.S. Steel … will be able to compete and thrive well into the future—and we will … take all appropriate action to protect our legal rights and secure that future," the companies said. They vowed "to deliver the agreed upon value of $55.00 per share for U.S. Steel's stockholders upon closing."

The companies could challenge the decision on the grounds that the White House and CFIUS circumvented standard procedure. The companies on Friday alleged regulators "did not give due consideration to a single mitigation proposal" they had offered. The review process, they said, "was deeply corrupted by politics, and the outcome was pre-determined." 

US Steel Has Had Other Interested Buyers

Should the companies fail to convince a court that the review process was flawed, U.S. Steel would be entitled to a $565 million payout from Nippon for its failure to close the deal. That amount, while significant, likely wouldn't be enough to address the problems that compelled U.S. Steel to sell itself in the first place. 

Domestic rival Cleveland-Cliffs (CLF) offered to buy U.S. Steel in 2023 and only gave up after the Nippon deal was announced in December of that year. That domestic tie-uဣp, if revived, would face much less resistance in Washington, and would likely have the support of the United Steelworkers, who approved of Cleveland-Cliffs' initial offer.

Cleveland-Cliffs CEO Lourenco Goncalves has said he's still interested in U.S. Steel, though there's no guarantee the company would make a second offer, as it recently closed a nearly $3 billion acquisition of Canadian steelmaker Stelco.

Instead, the company could get sold off in parts, according to steel analyst Josh Spoores. "It's hard to see any steel entity as they are today buying all of US Steel," Spoores told Bloomberg in September.

Article Sources
Investopedia requires writers to use primary sources to support their work. These include white papers, government data, original reporting, and interviews with industry experts. We also reference original research from other reputable publishers where appropriate. You can learn more about the standards we follow in producing accurate, unbiased content in our editorial policy.
  1. U.S. Steel. “.”

  2. Securities and Exchange Commission. "."

  3. Cleveland-Cliffs. "."

  4. Bloomberg. "."

Compare Accounts
The offers that appear in this table are from partnerships from which Investopedia receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where listings appear. Investopedia does not include all offers available in the marketplace.

Related Articles