澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果体彩网

Lipstick Effect: Definition, Theory, and Value As Economic Indicator

Close up of a person holding up the Chanel Rouge Allure Luminous Intense Lip Color Lipstick on a silk fabric background

InStyle / Jhett Thompson

What Is the Lipstick Effect?

The lipstick effect is when consumers still spend money on small indulgences during recessions, economic downturns, or when they personally have little cash. They do not have enough to spend on big-ticket luxury items; however, many still find the cash for purchases of small luxury items, such as premium lipstick. For this reason, companies that benefit from the lipstick effect tend to be🦄 resilient even during economic downturns.

Key Takeaways

  • The lipstick effect describes the observation that consumers will still tend to buy small luxury items even during an economic downturn.
  • Cash-strapped consumers want to treat themselves to something that lets them forget their financial problems.
  • Sales of small luxury items can be used as an indicator of economic recessions based on the lipstick effect.

Understanding the Lipstick Effect

The lipstick effect is a manifestation of something that economists call the 澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果体彩网:income effect. Economists break down consumer demand for any given product as a combination of the effects of the price of a good relative to other goods, known as the 澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果体彩网:substitution effect, and the consumer's income, kno🧸wn ꧙as the income effect.

For 澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果体彩网:normal goods, as a consumer's income rises, so does demand. However, for some goods, known as 澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果体彩网:inferior goods, rising co🤡nsumer income actually weakens demand, and vice versa. Cheap domestic beer is a classic example of an inferior good.

This is what occurs in the case of the lipstick effect. As consumers' incomes fall, they will forgo big-ticket luxury goods purchases that they can no longer afford and instead spend their (reduced) 澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果体彩网:discretionary income on smaller luxury items.

The lipstick effect is one of the reasons that fast-casual restaurants and movie complexes typically do well amid recessions. Cash-strapped consumers want to treat themselves to something that lets them forget their financial problems. They can't afford to escape to Bermuda. However, they’ll settle for a fairly cheap night out and a movie, adjusting their budget accordingly.

Another theoretical basis for the lipstick effect is that labor markets become more competitive during an economic recession. This can lead job seekers to spend more on goods that enhance their perceived advantages over other candidate employees in order to get or keep a job. One way of doing this is to pay more attention to the visible aspects of one's job market appeal by using more or better cosmetics.

Advantages and Disadvantages of the Lipstic🥂k Effect As an Indicator

Lipstick as an economic indicator makes sense. Unlike the 澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果体彩网:Super Bowl indicator, which is a spurious m𒆙a🎃rket indicator that few take seriously, the lipstick indicator is firmly based on economic theory.

Fast Fact

Leonard Lauder, the chair of Estée Lauder, noted following the terrorist attacks of September 2001 that his company sold more lipstick than usual. As a result, he theorized that lipstick is a contrary economic indicator.

One of the only problems with the lipstick indicator is that it can be difficult for the public to access sales data on lipstick and similar products at regular intervals, suc𓃲h as weekly or monthly.

The U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) publishes quarterly data revealing personal consumption expenditures on "personal care products," while the U.S. Census publishes monthly data on retail sales by "health and personal care stores" but with a few months of lag time. In short, the lack of timely data limits the usefulness of the lipstick effect in predicting economic downturns.

As a result, the lipstick indicator helps the chair of Estée Lauder know how to plan his budget, but it’s of no practical use to a regular mom-and-pop investor unless they als🧸o can easily track lipstick sales.

Also, it's worth noting that if an economic contraction is severe enough, incomes continue to fall, and consumers may tend to eschew even small indulgences. Theoretically, at least, sales of lipstick or Starbucks coffee fail to be predictive when sales of pretty much everything contract at the same time.

When Did the Lipstick Effect Start?

The lipstick effect theory was first described by Juliet Schor in her book "The Overspent American" in 1998.

What Is an Example of the Lipstick Effect?

In times of economic downturns, individuals may still purchase some items that are not completely necessary, such as lipstick, coffee, cigarettes, and movie tickets. Purchasing these allows for a sense of normalcy and indulgence when economic times are hard. Rather than cutting out these indulgences c🀅ompletely, people still purchase them.

What Is the Lipstick Effect in 2024?

While there remains economic uncertainty in 2024 due to high interest rates and higher inflation than before COVID, consumers still purchase items that are not essential but preserve a sense of indulgence, such as health, wellness, and beauty products.

The Bottom Line

The lipstick effect shows how the demand for small 🦩luxury items survives in times of economic downturns as consumers seek somewhat affordable indulgences to preserve a sense of normalcy during trying times.

Whilℱe the lipstick effect is good for luxury businesses, it provides little insight for investors as they are not able to access timely sales data. Furthermore, in times of severe economic downturns, the lipstick e🍨ffect loses its predictive value as consumers cut down on all non-essential spending.

Article Sources
Investopedia requires writers to use primary sources to support their work. These include white papers, government data, original reporting, and interviews with industry experts. We also reference original research from other reputable publishers where appropriate. You can learn more about the standards we follow in producing accurate, unbiased content in our editorial policy.
  1. Netchaeva, Ekaterina and McKenzie Rees. "." Psychological Science, vol. 27, no. 8, June 2016, pp. 1157-1168.

  2. The Wall Street Journal. "."

  3. U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis. "." Select "Table 2.4.5U. Personal Consumption Expenditures by Type of Product."

  4. U.S. Census Bureau. "." Page 5.

  5. U.S. Census Bureau. "."

  6. Forbes. "."

  7. Forbes. "."

Related Articles