澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果体彩网

Tertiary Recovery: What it Means, How it Works

An engineer reads a pressure guage at an oil well using thermal injection to recover additional oil reserves.

carebott / Getty Images

Definition

Also called enhanced oil recovery (EOR), tertiary recovery is the third phase of oil extraction.

Tertiary recovery, also known as enhanced oil recovery (EOR), is the third stage used to extract oil from an oil reserve. Since it's more costly than the primary recovery and secondary recovery stages, tertiary recovery is only carried out when the price of oil is high enough to justify the investment. It also involves somღe of the most controversial industry practices.

Key Takeaways

  • Tertiary recovery is a method for extracting oil from an oil reserve.
  • More expensive than the first two stages of oil recovery, tertiary recovery is only used once the others have been exhausted.
  • The types of tertiary recovery include thermal injection, gas injection, and chemical injection.
  • This is different from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and other regulators' use of Class I, Class II, and Class III for oil wells.

How Tertiary Recovery Works

Although there are many tertiary recovery techniques, all extract oil by changing its composition to make it easier to remove. This generally means lowering the oil's viscosity or thickness. Let's go through the first two stages to understand better why the methods for the third are used.

The primary recovery stage of extracting oil uses "natural" methods, typically taking advantage of the pressure difference between the oil well's surface and its underground reserves. When you see oil pumps and derricks dotting the landscape, called "nodding donkeys" or pumpjacks, these are typically involved in the primary recovery phase of oil extraction. This method works by increasing the pressure inside the oil reserve using steam or natural gas injections. However, this only recovers from about 5% to 15% of the oil in the reserve because pressure depletes over time.

More techniques are needed to get at more of the oil, which brings us to secondary recovery. The goal is to maintain or increase the reservoir's pressure and expel the oil toward the production wells. The most common secondary recovery technique is waterflooding, which involves injecting water into the reservoir to increase the pressure. Waterflooding is effective because water is readily available and relatively inexpensive as an injectant, though this doesn't begin to account for the potential ecological effects. Another common secondary recovery method is gas injection, which can involve injecting natural gas, nitrogen, or carbon dioxide into the reservoir.

Typically, secondary recovery can extract another 10% to 20% of the reservoir's original oil, although this varies widely depending on the composition of the oil in the reserve and area geology.

Since it comes after the first two methods and costs more, firms that extract oil may abandon wells without progressing to tertiary recovery if the oil price is not high enough to justify the expense. While the first two stages change the reservoir pressure to push the oil o✱ut (or to where it can be extracted more easily), the last changes the oil to make it extractable. There are three primary methods of tertiary recovery:

  1. Chemical: Chemical injections involve pumping surfactants, solvents, and polymers into the reservoir. Surfactants and solvents lower the surface tension between the oil and water, and the polymers thicken the injection fluids. As with the other methods, this approach enables the oil to flow more toward the surface, while the increased viscosity of the polymer makes oil recovery more effective. Because of its complexity and environmental concerns, chemical methods are used less often than thermal or gas injection methods.
  2. Gas injection: This method accounts for about 60% of EOR production in the U.S. Oil is extracted by pumping gas, such as carbon dioxide, nitrogen, or natural gas, into the reservoir. In the secondary method, these gasses expand, increasing the pressure of the reservoir and pushing the oil toward the surface. In the third stage, the gasses mix with the oil to lower its viscosity and increase its volume, causing it to flow to the production wells. Carbon dioxide and hydrocarbon gasses, like ethane, propane, and butane, can be used in these processes. The added benefit of using carbon dioxide is that some are left behind ("sequestered"), thus capturing it away from the atmosphere, where it can join other climate-changing gasses. In the past, the carbon dioxide came from naturally occurring carbon dioxide reserves. However, it is now possible to harvest carbon dioxide from 澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果体彩网:natural gas processors and fertilizer and ethanol production plants, though most oil fields are far closer to the naturally occurring reserves. Pipelines can then transport carbon dioxide to the injection site, making tertiary recovery more available and efficient than in the past. Nevertheless, much of the CO2 used was already underground, not in the atmosphere, and ends up emitted into the atmosphere, not sequestered, until the techniques improve.
  3. Thermal: These methods heat the reservoir heated by injecting water, which quickly converts into steam. The steam then warms the oil, causing it to thin and flow more easily toward the lower-pressure areas of the surface. 

Oil Recovery Stages vs. EPA Classes

While primary, secondary, and tertiary recovery refer to techniques for extracting oil from underground reservoirs, they don't correlate directly with the classifications used by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) under the Safe Drinking Water Act. Below, we make distinguishinཧg them easier with a table:

Oil Recovery Stages vs. EPA Classes
 Oil Recovery Stages EPA Well Classifications
Primary recovery: This relies on natural reservoir pressure to bring oil and gas to the surface. It's the most natural and least invasive but recovers only about 15% of a reservoir's oil. Class I: Used to inject non-hazardous industrial waste fluids below the deepest underground drinking water sources. 
Secondary recovery: This involves injecting fluids like water or gas into the reservoir to maintain pressure and move the oil toward production wells. After primary recovery, it can recover an extra 20-40% of the remaining oil. Class II: Used for oil and gas production, including the brines and other fluids brought to the surface during production.
Tertiary recovery or EOR: This uses advanced and costly techniques like chemical flooding, heat, and gas injection to move trapped oil inaccessible by secondary methods. It can recover another 5% to 20% of the oil. Class III: Used for injecting fluids for EOR techniques or for geological carbon dioxide sequestration under the lowermost underground source of drinking water.

The EPA also has further classes, four through six, which generally don't involve oil production. Class IV wells are those that inject hazardous or radioactive waste into the ground that includes part of the water supply for an area. Class V is for injecting nonhazardous fluids into or above underground drinking water supplies. Class VI is for the underground, long-term storage of carbon dioxide.

Pros and Cons of Tertiary Recovery

Pros and Cons of Tertiary Recovery

Pros
  • Increases production by recꦇovering previously unreachable oil.

  • Cert𓃲ain EOR techniques like nanobubbles can be more efficient.

  • Some EౠOR technologies enable the reduction of carbon dioxide emissions throꦇugh carbon sequestration.

Cons
  • High cost compared with primary and secondary recovery stages.

  • M♓ay cause environmental problems such ﷽as ecological degradation.

  • Not all oil can be recovered, leading to waste.

The tertiary recovery method has several advantages. First, it enables the recovery of oil that couldn’t be retrieved from primary or secondary means, increasing productivity in an oil reservoir. Second, some EOR techniques, like nanobubbles, are free of the disadvantages of approaches and could, therefore, be more efficient. Finally, some EOR technologies could sequester some carbon dioxide, reducing their emission into the atmosphere.

Nevertheless, tertiary recovery has significant disadvantages. The high cost at the tertiary stage over the primary and secondary recovery stages i𓆏s its major drawback within the oil industry. This makes it too expensive unless🍃 oil prices are high. In addition, not all the oil can be recovered by this method. For instance, in the case of oil sands, only 75% of its tar-like bitumen can be recovered, leaving behind a huge amount of waste.

Most notably, besꦇides their cost and complexity, these techniques are among the most controversial of all modern industrial processes. Tertiary techniques can produce environmental, social, and health effects. Here are some methods best known👍 by the public:

  • Acid: This is often what's meant by the chemicals discussed in EOR. It thus plays a significant role in tertiary oil recovery. As fields mature and primary and secondary recovery methods become less effective, acidizing can help move the remaining oil. For example, it can remove scale, drilling mud, and other substances that block pore spaces and reduce ways for the oil to move toward wells. Also, in reservoirs where other EOR methods like steam or carbon dioxide injections can't be used, acidizing can dissolve rock and make it more permeable for recovering the oil.
  • Arctic drilling: EOR methods can play a significant role in Arctic drilling. Given the harsh conditions and high extraction costs, maximizing the recovery of oil from each well is crucial for the firms involved. EOR techniques such as gas injection can help by mobilizing the oil that remains after primary and secondary recovery methods. The Arctic environment is fragile, and any oil spill or mishap would have devastating effects on the local ecosystem.
  • Hydraulic fracturing (fracking): Mostly used in the primary recovery phase but can also be used as a tertiary method. This involves injecting high-pressure fluid into 澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果体彩网:shale formations to create fractures, allowing oil or natural gas to flow more freely to the production wells. The method has drawn widespread concerns over groundwater contamination, induced seismic activity (earthquakes), excessive water use, and ecological degradation.
  • Offshore deep-water drilling: Mainly primary recovery, though secondary and tertiary techniques are applied in later stages. These methods risk major oil spills and impact marine ecosystems even when they don't occur.
  • Tar sands (oil sands) extraction: This often relies on techniques involved in tertiary recovery because of the need to reduce the viscosity of the tar-like bitumen for extraction. About 10% of all oil reserves are in the so-called 澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果体彩网:tar sands of Alberta, Canada, making it valuable when the price of oil goes up. Methods include surface mining and techniques that require great amounts of energy and water, cause great damage to surrounding land and ecology, cause greenhouse gas emissions, and pollute local groundwater.

As oil recovery requires more and more expense and effort, the lines between these stages can blur, especially as the sophistication of the processes involved increases with each passing decade, and the materials used (water, gasse♏s, etc.) are put to use in different stages.

Is Tertiary Recovery Widely Used in the Oil Industry?

While it's a useful method, tertiary recovery is not always employed because of its high cost and complexity. Just as arctic wells and tar sand recovery comes and goes with the price of oil—the wells pick up production when it's worth it again—so, too, with tertiary production.

What Is the Role of Carbon Dioxide in Tertiary Recovery?

In an important tertiary recovery process, CO2 is injected into the well to push out more oil and some of that could be potentially stored underground. The U.S. Department of Energy hopes the method increases American oil production but also helps cut the industry's ultimate effect on the climate by sequestering CO2. For the time being, though, much of the CO2 used by the industry was already "sequestered"—it comes from underground natural sources—so any of it that's not put back underground adds to overall CO2 emissions. Until the industry uses CO2 that would otherwise be in the atmosphere, it seems unlikely that, even leaving aside oil's future use as fuel, such production can be entirely carbon neutral. As such, critics find it's a kind of 澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果体彩网:greenwashing. It "creates the idea that we can go on burning oil and gas indefinitely and somehow make the carbon disappear," Carroll Muffetts, president and CEO of the Center for International Environmental Law, told Investopedia in its Green Investor Podcast.

Can Tertiary Recovery Methods Harm the Environment?

They can harm the environment because of the chemicals, risk of leaks or spills, and excess CO2 pr💫oduced. Ultimately, of course, any oil recovered adds to the problems of climate change once used.

The Bottom Line

Tertiary recovery is the third oil extraction phase used when the first two stages aren't enough. It uses heat, gas, and chemical injection to extract hard-to-reach oil. CO2 could, in certain instances, be used to extract the oil and be requested underground where it can't help further heat the planet, but this is still very much in the offing, especially when oil prices go lower. EOR involves costly processes with significant environmental risks, making some of its techniques among the most well-known by the public. Nevertheless, these processes enable the recovery of vast amounts of oil that are used to power many of our modern economies.

Article Sources
Investopedia requires writers to use primary sources to support their work. These include white papers, government data, original reporting, and interviews with industry experts. We also reference original research from other reputable publishers where appropriate. You can learn more about the standards we follow in producing accurate, unbiased content in our editorial policy.
  1. International Energy Agency. "?"

  2. U.S. Department of Energy. "."

  3. Melissa N. Dunkle and William L. Winniford, eds. "." John Wiley & Sons, 2020. Pages 58-67.

  4. Washington Post. ""

  5. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. "."

  6. Environmental Protection Agency. "."

  7. Carbonremoval.com. "".

  8. U.S. Department of Energy. ""

Compare Accounts
The offers that appear in this table are from partnerships from which Investopedia receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where listings appear. Investopedia does not include all offers available in the marketplace.

Related Articles