澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果体彩网

Watch These SMH ETF Price Levels Amid Chip Sector Selloff

Fund Slumped By More Than 7% on Tuesday

Source: TradingView.com.

Key Takeaways

  • The VanEck Semiconductor ETF remains in the spotlight on Wednesday after tumbling more than 7% yesterday to register its largest daily percentage decline since March 2020 amid a broad-based selloff in chip stocks.
  • A relief rally in the fund recently stalled at the 50-day moving average, with Tuesday’s drop taking place on the highest daily volume since early August, pointing to conviction behind the move from larger market participants.
  • Amid further weakness in the ETF's price, investors should monitor key chart levels at $217, $200, $176, and $161.

The VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) remains in the spotlight on Wednesday after tumbling more than 7% yesterday to register its largest daily percentage decline since March 2020 amid a broad-based selloff in chip stocks. The top-weighted stock in the fund, 澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果体彩网:artificial intelligence (AI) darling Nvidia (NVDA), led the sell-off, slumping nearly 10%, while other leading chipmakers in the ETF’s 澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果体彩网:portfolio, including Intel (INTC), Marvell Technology (MRVL) and Micron (MU), all dropped by around 8%.

The chips sector has seen significant gains over the past year, as AI’s widespread adoption bolsters demand. 澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果体彩网:Volatility across the group has increased in recent trading sessions after Nvidia reported earnings that topped Wall Street estimates but showed that 澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果体彩网:growth is slowing.

Below, we’ll take a closer look at the ETF's chart and use 澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果体彩网:technical analysis to identiඣfy important levels to watch out for amid increasing price fluctuations꧃ in chip stocks.

Recovery Stalls at 50-Day Moving Average

Since forming a 澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果体彩网:double top in June and July, the fund’s price suffered a significant 澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果体彩网:correction before staging a relief rally from the closely-watched 200♛-day moving average (MA).

However, more recently, investors resumed selling on a retracement to the 澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果体彩网:50-day MA, with Tuesday’s drop taking place on the highest daily 澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果体彩网:trading volume since early August, pointing to conviction behind 💎ꩵthe move from larger market participants.

After falling 7ಞ.5% on Tuesday, SMH was down another 1.4% to $222.00 in premarket trading Wednesday at around 7:15 a.m. ET.

Monitor These Key Chart Levels

Looking ahead, investors should eye four key price levels on the ETF’s chart that could prove pivotal if weakness across the chip se♛ctor continues. 

The first sits around $217, a level on the chart where the fund could find initial support near the March pullback low, which also currently closely aligns with the risi🔯ng 200-day MA and a range of trading activity positioned near last month’s low.

A 澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果体彩网:breakdown below this level could see the ETF’s price decline to the $200 area, where it may encounter buying interest around the prominent April and August troughs. Last month’s low marks a technically important level, given the fund’s significant intraday reversal from this chart region.

The next lower price level to watch lies at $176, a location where the ETF could attract support from the December high that formed early in the stock’s up-trending move from October to March.

A more protracted correction may see the ETF revisit lower support around $161. This area could entice longer-term 澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果体彩网:buy-and-hold investors seeking 澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果体彩网:entry points near a range of comparable trading levels on the chart betwee𒅌n July and December last ye𒀰ar.

The comments, opinions, and analyses expressed on Investopedia are for informational purposes only. Read our 澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果体彩网:warranty and liability disclaimer for more info.

As of the date this article was written, the author does not own any of the above securities.

Do you have a news tip for Investopedia reporters? Please email us at
Article Sources
Investopedia requires writers to use primary sources to support their work. These include white papers, government data, original reporting, and interviews with industry experts. We also reference original research from other reputable publishers where appropriate. You can learn more about the standards we follow in producing accurate, unbiased content in our editorial policy.
  1. CNBC. "."

  2. ETF.com. "."

Compare Accounts
The offers that appear in this table are from partnerships from which Investopedia receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where listings appear. Investopedia does not include all offers available in the marketplace.

Related Articles