澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果体彩网

Why Your Marital Status Could Influence Whether You Own Stocks

couple looking at paper and laptop while sitting on the floor in front of their couch

miljko / Getty Images

People who are married are far more likely to own stocks, whether personally or jointly with their spouse, than single adults.

The higher household income achieved with two paychecks is a big factor but it isn't the only one. Research finds that economic risk-sharing nudges married couples into the market while many singles remain on the sidelines.

We explain below why being married means you're more likely to be in the market.

Key Takeaways

  • Married adults are far more likely to report owning stocks than single adults.
  • Combined incomes, pooled emergency funds, and the option to lean on a partner if one job disappears let married investors accept market risk more readily.
  • When one partner has 澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果体彩网:stock market experience, the other is far more likely to start investing after they get together.

Household Income and Risk Pooling

According to Gallup’s latest survey data, 77% of married Americans say they own stocks, individually or jointly with their spouse, whether directly or via mutual funds or retirement accounts. That compares with just 49% of single adults. Married couples are also far more likely to have 澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果体彩网:tax-advantaged retirement accounts.

What explains this gap? First, a married couple with two salaries likely enjoys 澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果体彩网:higher household earnings than a single indi𒀰vidual, and therefore, more money left over to invest.

Crucially, having two salaries also reduces risk in one area of a married couple's economic life, enabling them to take on more risk via the stock market. Consider that if one partner loses their job, the other's salary will help carry them, making an unexpected layoff or medical bill less likely to burn through savings or force a fire sale of existing investments. That cushion encourages couples to open 澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果体彩网:brokerage accounts earlierও and keep contributing through downturns.

Marriage as a 'Safe Asset'

In fact, some economists see marriage as a sort of “澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果体彩网:safe asset” that lowers overall household risk, especially for women. Households became nearly ten percentage points more likely to own equities within two years of marrying. Data also show that separated individuals pare that back again after divorce, suggesting the “spousal safety net” effect fades once the partnership ends.

Gender Differences and Shared Decision‑Making

Even if one spouse isn't an investor, social learning is often at work: if the other is, it can bring them into the fold. Recent studies find that when one partner already has stock market experience, the other is far likelier to start investing after moving in together (and single men are more likely to be shareholders than single women). Research from Denmark also finds women’s stock ownership climbs markedly after marriage, with men showing smaller but still positive shifts.

But there are some caveats. Behavioral research indicates that single men tend to trade more aggressively—sometimes to their detriment—while married investors, particularly women, may under‑diversify by overweighting employer stock or keeping excess cash.

Still, the overall direction of the evidence is clear: mar🌊riage raises stock ma꧋rket participation, and the couple’s internal dynamics shape how much risk they ultimately take.

The Bottom Line

With higher household incomes and psychological safety nets, marriage stacks the odds in favor of owning stocks. Singles can narrow the gap by automating contributions, 澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果体彩网:building an emergency fund, and seeking outside accountability—from a friend, financial planner, or even a 澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果体彩网:roboadvisor app—to help replicate the risk‑sharing and information benefits couples naturally enjo♊y. In the end, relationship status should inform, but not dictate, your investing choices.

Article Sources
Investopedia requires writers to use primary sources to support their work. These include white papers, government data, original reporting, and interviews with industry experts. We also reference original research from other reputable publishers where appropriate. You can learn more about the standards we follow in producing accurate, unbiased content in our editorial policy.
  1. Gallup. "?"

  2. Congressional Research Service. "." P. 4.

  3. U.S. Federal Reserve. "."

  4. Bertocchi, Graziella, Marianna Brunetti, and Costanza Torricelli. "." Journal of Banking & Finance 35.11 (2011): Pp. 2902-2915.

  5. Christiansen, Charlotte, Juanna Schröter Joensen, and Jesper Rangvid. "." Economic Inquiry 53.1 (2015): Pp. 431-447.

  6. Bacher, Annika. "." The Review of Financial Studies (2024): hhae068.

  7. Christensen, Camilla Skovbo, and Isabel Skak Olufsen. "." No. 05/25. CEBI Working Paper Series, 2025.

  8. Dimmock, Stephen G., et al. "." The Review of Financial Studies 34.9 (2021): Pp. 4524-4563.

  9. Barber, Brad M., and Terrance Odean. "." The quarterly journal of economics 116.1 (2001): Pp. 261-292.

Compare Accounts
The offers that appear in this table are from partnerships from which Investopedia receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where listings appear. Investopedia does not include all offers available in the marketplace.

Related Articles