澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果体彩网

What Could the Proposed Federal Budget Mean For Student Loan Borrowers?

U.S. Speaker of the House Mike Johnson (R-LA) speaks to media after the House passed a Republican budget resolution.

Kayla Bartkowski/Getty Images

KEY TAKEAWAYS

  • As the government nears its March 14 budget deadline, a Republican budget resolution moved one step closer to being passed.
  • The resolution calls for $4.5 trillion in tax cuts and a reduction of $2 trillion in federal spending. The $330 billion of that is directed to be cut by the House Education and Workforce Committee.
  • A proposal to follow the directed cuts would eliminate higher education tax benefits, increase monthly loan payments, and eliminate student loan and grant programs.

The House passed a budget blueprint that could increase monthly student loan pay𝔉ments and eliminate critical student 🍬protection programs.

As the government approaches its March 14 deadline to pass a federal budget, a Republican budget resolution, which calls for $4.5 trillion in tax cuts and $2 trillion less in federal spending, was narrowly passed late Tuesday. The plan 🍸includes directing the House Education and Workforce Committee to cut $330 billion in the next 10 years. The com🦩mittee oversees elementary, secondary, and postsecondary programs.

"The American people have been clear that they want to end wasteful government spending. This budget resolution delivers on that promise while providing relief to working families, students, and small businesses," Tim Walberg (R-MI), Education and Workforce Committee chairman, said in a statement.

Experts said that to save that much, the House committee would likely have to cut♈ tax benefits for students, scale back key grants and loans or rework student loan repayment and forgiveness programs.

What's On The Chopping Block?

A document reportedly released by the House Ways and Means last month outlined some student loan and grant programs the committee could possibly cut to reach its savings goal.

Representatives could eliminate tax benefits for higher education students and borrowers, such as the American Opportunity Tax Credit (AOTC), the Lifetime Learning Credit (LLC), and tax deductions of interest on student loans. In addition, one proposal wo𝓀uld make 🍸all scholarship and fellowship income taxable.

The new budget could also repeal former President Joe Biden's Saving for a Valuable Education (SAVE) plan and eliminate other income-driven repayment (IDR) plans. Instead𓆏, borrowers would only have two repayment options: a standard repayment or a new ID💎R plan.

Officials at The Institute For College Access and Success (TICAS) said that reworking the income-driven repayment plans is likely going to be part of the plan to cut spending because of the high target amounts. Recently, the Department of Education 澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果体彩网:closed applicati𝕴ons for those plans.

House Republicans proposed a new IDR plan last year that would increase borrowers' monthly payments by almost $200 on average, according to The Institute For College Access and Success (TICAS) analysis.

"Borrowers are just in a really tough spot, and we know a lot of folks are already struggling to afford monthly payments even under a more affordable plan, and so any increase in monthly payment expectation is going to be hard for a lot of folks," said Michele Zampini, senior director of college affordability at TICAS.

In addition, the proposal suggested reforming Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF), "including limiting ๊eligibility for the program."

Pell Grants could be reformed by capping grants at the median cost of attendance or expanding eligibility to short-term credential programs, which the 澳洲幸运5官方开༺奖结果体彩网:nominee to he♊ad of the Department of Education said she would support.

The critical loan programs that allow parents to share the cost of higher education, PLUS and gr﷽ad PLUS loans, could also be eliminated as 𓃲part of the budget cuts.

Do you have a news tip for Investopedia reporters? Please email us at
Article Sources
Investopedia requires writers to use primary sources to support their work. These include white papers, government data, original reporting, and interviews with industry experts. We also reference original research from other reputable publishers where appropriate. You can learn more about the standards we follow in producing accurate, unbiased content in our editorial policy.
  1. The New York Times. "."

  2. New York Times. "."

  3. The Institute For College Access and Success. "."

Related Articles