What Is the Financial CHOICE Act?
The term Financial CHOICE Act refers to a bill introduced in the U.S. Congress in 2017. The bill was designed to roll back regulations set by the 🍃Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform ꦡand Consumer Protection Act, which was passed in 2010 in response to the 澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果体彩网:2007-2008 financial crisis.
The bill aimed to relax regulations for financial institutions, including stress testing as well as capital and liquidity requirements. Republicans claimed Dodd-Frank was an example of regulatory overreach, despite studies suggesting it was likely responsible for increased financial stability. Since the Senate didn't push the bill forward, it died in the House.
Key Takeaways
- The Financial CHOICE Act promised to repeal provisions of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.
- The bill aimed to relax financial industry regulations, including stress tests as well as capital and liquidity requirements.
- Critics argued that the bill created unregulated incentives that led to the financial crisis, setting up the economy for another.
- The bill was approved by the House but died after the Senate failed to push it further.
Understanding the Financial CHOICE Act
Rep. Jeb Hensarling (R-TX), the chair of the 澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果体彩网:House Financial Services Committee, introduced the Financial CHOICE Act after Republicans won control of Congress in 2017. Much of the bill focused on rolling back regulations introduced by the Dodd-Frank Act, which was passed in response to the 澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果体彩网:financial crisis. Many observers felt that the lack of effective regulations targeting 澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果体彩网:financial institutions led to the financial meltdown.
Important
The Consumer Financial Protection Bur﷽eau was established under Dodd-Frank to p൲revent predatory mortgage lending practices.
Some of Dodd-Frank’s provisions increased transparency into financial products, particularly 澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果体彩网:derivatives. It also streamlined the regulatory process, eliminated regulatory exemptions, provided for a more orderly 澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果体彩网:winding up of bankrupt firms, and improved consumer protections. Financial institutions complained about the amount they s🐟pent to comply with the Act and that the economic benefit wasn't obvious. Wall Street claimed that removing regulations would make lending easier and invigorate 🔯the economy.
The bill passed in the House of Representatives along party lines, 233-186 on June 8, 2017. Proponents touted it as a jobs bill that would allow the president to fire heads of the 澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果体彩网:Consumer Financia🍌l Protection Bureaꦛu (CFPB) and 澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果体彩网:Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) at any time and for any reason. The bill also intended to:
- Give Congress oversight of the CFPB’s budget
- Eliminate the Orderly Liquidation Authority, a Dodd-Frank provision that allows the federal government to save large financial institutions from collapse
- Limit the CFPB’s scope by preventing it from prohibiting “unfair, deceptive, or abusive acts or practices”
- Push for restricting 澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果体彩网:arbitration as a resolution mechanism
Congressional opponents of the bill were almost exclusively Democrats. Critics stated that rolling back regulations was unlikely to provide the benefits that its proponents claimed, that returns seen by Wall Street were not negatively impacted by having to comply with stricter standards, and that regulations were not leading to economic stagnation. The billꦕ was not passed by the Senate, so its provisions were not 🐻enacted.
Special Considerations
Although the Final CHOICE Act died, a similar bill was signed into law, which promised to provide some relief to segments of the 澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果体彩网:financial sector. The Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act was signed by President Donald Trump on May 24, 2018, after it was approved by the House and passed by the Senate.
According to the bill, the Act provi♏des the followi𓆏ng:
- Relaxed lending rules for the mortgage industry and amendments to the 澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果体彩网:Truth in Lending Act (TILA)
- Regulatory relief to community banks
- Consumer credit protections
- Alterations of capital threshold requirements by certain banks
- Encouragement for the formation of capital
- Protection for student loan borrowers
What Is the Financial CHOICE Act?
The Financial CHOICE Act was a U.S. legislative proposal introduced by House Republicans in 2017 aimed at rolling back financial regulations established by the Dodd-Frank Act. It offered financial institutions a chance to bypass certain rules in exchange for higher capital reserves, intendi🌃ng to enhance financial stability, improve lending, and encourage economic growth by reducing bureaucratic hurdles.
How Would the Financial CHOICE Act Have Affected Bank Regulations?
The Financial CHOICE Act aimed to reduce regulations on banks by allowing them to opt-out of certain provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act. On one hand,🔯 it would have de-regulated financial markets. On the other hand, some could argue it would have increased the efficiency in capital markets.
Why Was the Financial CHOICE Act Proposed?
The Financial CHOICE Act was pro🅰posed by Republican lawmakers as a response to what they saw as overregulation following the 2008 financial crisis.
The Bottom Line
The Financial CHOICE Act was introduced to reduce regulatory burdens on financial institutions by allowing them to opt out of certain Dodd-Frank provisions in exchange for maintaining higher capital reserves. It aims to foster economic growth by promoting more flexibility for banks. Though it made it through the H𓄧ouse, it did not make it through the Senate.