澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果体彩网

Unions Scored Big Victories In 2023: Why Don't More People Join Them?

Hollywood actors SAG-AFTRA strike
Members of the Hollywood actors SAG-AFTRA union walk a picketജ line💖 with screenwriters last July.

David McNew / Stringer / Getty Images

Key Takeaways

  • Union membership dropped to 10% of the workforce in 2023, an all-time low in government data going back to 1983, down from 10.1% in 2022.
  • The downtick happened despite a number of high-profile victories by the UAW and other unions.
  • Fierce resistance from companies has hindered union efforts to capitalize on their success by forming unions at more companies.
  • Labor experts say companies have become expert at using the legal system to thwart organization efforts and stall contract negotiations.

Here’s a puzzler: unions representing auཧtoworkers, screenwriters, and baristas scored big victories in 2023, while publ𒁃ic opinion of unions is near its highest level in decades, yet the membership rate slipped to its lowest ever. How come? 

Fierce legal opposition from companies, the aftermath of a 2018 Supreme Court decision, and the slow wheels of bureaucracy are all among the reasons that a resurgence in union organizing has not—or hasn’t yet—translated into a re🌸versal of a generation-long slide in union membership, labor experts said. 

“It’s 🦩always a slog,” said Michelle Fecteau, a director at the Center for Labor and Community Studies at the Unive🌼rsity of Michigan, Dearborn. “They don’t call it a ‘struggle’ for nothing.” 

When the Department of Labor released its yearly data on union membership this week, the results weren’t what organized labor advocates wanted to see. Only 10% of the workforce were union members in 2023, down from 10.1% in 2022, and a record low in data going back to 1983. The membership rate hit another milestone, falling below half of the 20.1% union membership rate in 1983

The continued slow downtick in ♎union membersཧhip came despite several high-profile union victories this year. Those included: 

All this happened in a labor market where, by historical standards, workers have a lot of leverage: 澳洲幸运𝓀5官方开奖结果体彩网:Unemployment was near historic lows, and there were far more open jobs than jobless 🐷workers to fill꧅ them. 

Despite all those advantages and victories, organizing efforts were hindered by some powerfuಌl factors. 

The Supreme Court

In 2018, the Supreme Court dealt unions a blow when, in a 5-4 decision in the Janus vs. AFSCME case, the court’s conservative majority ruled that public employees no longer had to pay dues to unions if they work under a union contract but are not union members themselves.

This ruling meant that unions representing public employees, such as school teachers, now have to spend more effort and money getting individual people to sign up, detracting from their other activities, said Kate Bronfenbrenner, director of labor education research and a professor at Cornell University's School of Industrial and Labor Relations.

“Because they have to spend so many resources signing up the members they already have, that is taking away resources from doing new organizing,” Br✃onfenbrenner said.

Indeed, the union 💞membership trend is worse among public sector unions than for those in private industry, according to the BLS data. In 2023, the num🐟ber of union members in the private sector rose by 191,000, but the overall rate went down because more non-union jobs were added to the economy. 

However, pu🌳blic sector employees actually lost 52,000 members, highlighting the damage the Janus decision has done to public sector unions. 

Fierce opposition from employers

Another reason, Bronfenbrenner said, is that companies have fiercely resisted unionization efforts, especially in the couꩲrts. 

“They're challenging certifications or filing charges against the unions, which then get dismissed, but they delay all those certifications and delay the collective bargaining process,” she said. 

For example, after workers at an Amazon (AMZN) warehouse in Staten Island voted to unionize in 2022, Amazon unsuccessfully filed with the 澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果体彩网:National Labor Relations Board to overturn the results. However, the union has yet to negotiate a labor contract, and the union has accused the online retailer of stalling the process, according to press reports.

Some conservative groups celebrated last year’s decline in union membership.

“American workers continue to reject forced labor union membership, instead choosing freedom and self-determination in the workplace,” Americans for Tax Reform, a pro-business lobbying group, said in a blog post. 

Contracts take time, especial🍨ly if someone’🍸s stalling

The way the 澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果体彩网:Bureau of Labor Statistics counts u🌱nion membership, people in a workplace represented by a union may not count if they don’t have a contract—that means many of last year’s successful unionization drives aren’t yet showing up in the statistics,  Bronfenbrenner said. 

So far, she said, many com🥀panies have been able to use delaying tactics to avoid reaching contracts with unions, and have suffered very little legal repercussion. 

💮 “Th🥃ese corporations feel like until something changes, the cost of not bargaining is less than the cost of bargaining,” she said. 

The slow pace of unionization has helped drive rates down, as unionized workers are laid off or retire as part of the natural churn of the economy, Heidi Shierholz, president of the Economic Policy Institute, a progressive think tank, said in a commentary.

“As a result of the growing employer opposition to unions and the failure of policy to stem it, workers are unable to organize new union members fast enough under current labor law to keep pace with the natural ‘churning out’ of unionized jobs,” she wrote. 

Do you have a news tip for Investopedia reporters? Please email us at
Article Sources
Investopedia requires writers to use primary sources to support their work. These include white papers, government data, original reporting, and interviews with industry experts. We also reference original research from other reputable publishers where appropriate. You can learn more about the standards we follow in producing accurate, unbiased content in our editorial policy.
  1. Bureau of Labor Statistics. "."

  2. Gallup. "."

  3. Supreme Court. ""

  4. Americans for Tax Reform. "."

  5. Economic Policy Institute. "."

Compare Accounts
The offers that appear in this table are from partnerships from which Investopedia receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where listings appear. Investopedia does not include all offers available in the marketplace.

Related Articles