澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果体彩网

Tied Selling: What it Means, How it Works, Example

A salesperson at an office desk motions with their hand as they attempt to coerce a reluctant customer into buying an additional product from their company.

Tetra Images / Getty Images

What Is Tied Selling?

Tied selling is the illegal practice of a company providing a product or service on the condition that a customer purchases some other product or service. It is frequ💜ently used in reference 𝐆to banks and is sometimes referred to as coercive tied selling.

Tied selling is also associated with the sales practices of product tying or bundling, which may be legal in some contexts. Tied selling may also be referred to as a "tying arrangemen♈t" or a "tying agreement."

Key Takeaways

  • Tied selling, which is against the law, occurs when a company conditions the sale of a product or service only if that customer purchases some other product or service.
  • In the U.S., "tied-in" selling or "tied" products are addressed by both the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ). 
  • Tied selling may be used as a means of price discrimination in that it may help banks (or other companies) consolidate a customer's business within a single provider.

How Tied Selling Works

Tied selling is related to the practice of "tying," the often-illegal arrangement where, in order to buy one product, the consumer must purchase another product that exists in a separate market. Tying may be applied more broadly than tied selling, which refers specifically to a banking practice and is a more common term in Canada.

Tied selling in a banking context is often referred to as "coercive tied selling." Tied selling is addressed in Canada's Bank Act: "A bank shall not impose undue pressure on, or coerce, a person to obtain a product or service from a particular person, including the bank and any of its affiliates, as a condition for obtaining another product or service from the bank."

In the U.S., tying falls under the wider legal umbrella of illegal competition that was originally censured by the 澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果体彩网:Sherman Antitrust Act and refined in later acts. Tying as a practice, as well as "tied-in" selling or "tied" products, is addressed by both the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ). 

Tied Selling vs. Tying vs. Bundling

Tied selling differs from bundling, which combines products and can afford consumers lower prices than if items were purchased individually, and preferential pricing, which is better pricing if a customer uses more of a company's goods or services. The distinction between tying (illegal) and bundling (legal within limits) is an important one for businesses to understand.

Tied selling may be used as a means of price discrimination in that it may help banks (or other companies) consolidate a customer's business within a single provider. It may also stymie competition by giving larger, full-service companies an edge over smaller, single-service providers or those with more limited product lineups, such as with startup companies.

In the context of bundling, tying may be beneficial to a consumer, providing discounts for bundling related products (such as fast-food value meals that are cheaper than if their component parts were purchased separately or more favorabl♒e rates, fees, or terms for banking products when multiple service services are used). 

Bundling or tying may also provide a better service or product experience for consumers, such as if a computer manufacturer limits the use of a specific type of peripheral hardware or software because aftermarket options may create errors or damage their prꦗoduct.

Tied Selling Example

An illegal example of tied selling would be when your bank's mortgage specialist tells you that you qualify for a 澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果体彩网:home mortgage but the bank will approve it only if you🌌 transfer your investments to tꦡhe bank or its affiliates.

Article Sources
Investopedia requires writers to use primary sources to support their work. These include white papers, government data, original reporting, and interviews with industry experts. We also reference original research from other reputable publishers where appropriate. You can learn more about the standards we follow in producing accurate, unbiased content in our editorial policy.
  1. Government of Canada. "." Accessed Jan. 30, 2021.

  2. U.S. Department of Justice. "." Accessed Jan. 30, 2021.

  3. Federal Trade Commission. "." Accessed Jan. 30, 2021.

Related Articles